Discussion about this post

User's avatar
<Mary L. Tabor>'s avatar

As the play continues, I keep being struck by how au courant it is ( know I said that before) --even though it takes place when the Democratic National Convention brought to it protesters of the Vietnam War. This reader always wants a love interest ... that seems pretty complicated here. Isn't it always?

For me now: I'm feeling as if, in LA, I am living under a president, who doesn't deserve that title and who thinks I am in a war zone.

All your writing, Jay, turns on the keys to the humane, the loving, the brave.

So, I await the finale.

PS: I'm hoping the photo is actually your office. In any case, love it!

Expand full comment
Maureen Doallas's avatar

I enjoy the humor you inject in the conversations, especially that back-and-forth with the investigator; the exchanges read well and true to character.

I think you also balance well the transitions of scenes between the characters' pasts and their present, and how the latter is beginning to catch up with the former but without anything being given away too soon.

This play, too, is both of its time and for our time. As I read, I can't help but think of the all the events of the '60s and '70s, and specifically the rise of such groups as the SDS and later the Weathermen (Weather Underground) and Black Panthers, how even more radicalized some of those activist groups became as the Vietnam War progressed, how members had to and did go into hiding, then eventually re-emerged, with a few even becoming upstanding academics - Angela Davis comes to mind. What interests me especially is that I cannot think of anyone on the left/far left in America today who is like the young Angela Davis or David Hoffman and calling for change that matters. Why did we have such pronounced (radical?) movements in the play's time period (and during our lives) but not now?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts