This heart, naked and knocking, going in clouds,
Smoke and a cry of light.
In pain, the voice of pain. The shadow of your cry.~ Muriel Rukeyser
Poets are not necessarily antifascist. Poetry is antifascist. A poem is not necessarily antifascist. Poetry is antifascist.
“The poetic as a way of thinking and feeling — against the constrictions of conformity and the profit-motive.”
When I stopped writing screenplays at the start of the new millennium (seemed momentous timing), I said to some around me, If I’m not going to make any money from writing, I’m really not going to make any money – I’m going to write poetry.
In our time, they say there is free speech.
They say there is no penalty for poets,
There is no penalty for writing poems.
They say this. This is the penalty.~ Muriel Rukeyser, “In Our Time” from The Speed of Darkness
From PRX, a non-profit media company specializing in audio journalism and storytelling.
Today we feature the radical work of Muriel Rukeyser, whose poetics treatise, The Life of Poetry, first published in 1949, can be called an anti-Fascist manifesto. We struggle at times to place Rukeyser inside our understanding of politics and poetry as she herself struggled to not be placed – like Thoreau, she did not wish to be regarded as a member of any incorporated society which she had not joined. But I think we can say that Muriel Rukeyser was a committed antifascist, which is not a party, it is a way. And the way of poetry, not just of poems, is the way of anti-fascism.
How to Be Anti-Fascist: Muriel Rukeyser and The Life of Poetry https://beta.prx.org/stories/355960 via @prx
Muriel Rukeyser wrote in many genres and forms and her books have won awards and been ignored, she has been praised and scorned often in the same breath and even by friends. She dared to write “unpoetically” – being among the first to write a kind of documentary verse with her best-known poem sequence “The Book of the Dead”; she transgressed by writing books about men and subjects that she had “no right to” according to the male experts in those fields; she wrote books that still confound us as readers today, like her verse biography of Wendell Willkie One Life. If nothing else Muriel Rukeyser was and is a challenge.
Many audio files of Rukeyser reading her work, from PennSound.
https://writing.upenn.edu/pennsound/linking-page/Rukeyser.php
Here, the "Ballad of Orange and Grape" serves as an example of Rukeyser rooting her poetry in the everyday life and demotic language of the streets to offer a profoundly commonplace representation of truth’s erasure – one that speaks perfectly to our Trumpian moment.
After you finish your work after you do your day after you've read your reading after you've written your say – you go down the street to the hot dog stand, one block down and across the way. On a blistering afternoon in East Harlem in the twentieth century. Most of the windows are boarded up, the rats run out of a sack – sticking out of the crummy garage one shiny long Cadillac; at the glass door of the drug-addiction center, a man who'd like to break your back. But here's a brown woman with a little girl dressed in rose and pink, too. Frankfurters frankfurters sizzle on the steel where the hot-dog-man leans – nothing else on the counter but the usual two machines, the grape one, empty, and the orange one, empty, I face him in between. A black boy comes along, looks at the hot dogs, goes on walking. I watch the man as he stands and pours in the familiar shape bright purple in the one marked ORANGE orange in the one marked GRAPE, the grape drink in the machine marked ORANGE and orange drink in the GRAPE. Just the one word large and clear, unmistakeable, on each machine. I ask him : How can we go on reading and make sense out of what we read? – How can they write and believe what they're writing, the young ones across the street, while you go on pouring grape in ORANGE and orange into the one marked GRAPE –? (How are we going to believe what we read and we write and we hear and we say and we do?) He looks at the two machines and he smiles and he shrugs and smiles and pours again. It could be violence and nonviolence it could be white and black women and men it could be war and peace or any binary system, love and hate, enemy, friend. Yes and no, be and not-be, what we do and what we don't do. On a corner in East Harlem garbage, reading, a deep smile, rape, forgetfulness, a hot street of murder, misery, withered hope, a man keeps pouring grape into ORANGE and orange into the one marked GRAPE, pouring orange into GRAPE and grape into ORANGE forever. ~ From The Collected Poems of Muriel Rukeyser.
In contrast, here is Rukeyser writing, deeply, movingly poetic language, in an untitled poem from that biography of Wendell Wilkie, One Life, also found in the Collected Poems. In its compassionate and celebratory cataloguing of American lives, there are echoes of Walt Whitman, and even – “Despised like you, criminal in intent; sunburnt, in love and splendid” – “Crossing Brooklyn Ferry.”
In your time, there have been those who spoke clearly For the moment of lightning. Were we all brave, but at different times? Even raped open and split, even anonymous, They spoke. They are not forgotten. But they are. In late summer; forgot; caught at cross-purposes, Interrupted in an hour of purity, Their lives careening along in the fierce cities, Through atrocious poverties and magnificence, The unforgotten, the early gone forgot. Late daytime, and nothing left to hide but an eye endowed With the charred, guilty, gouged by war, the raging splendor; Despised like you, criminal in intent; sunburnt, in love and splendid; This heart, naked and knocking, going in clouds, Smoke and a cry of light. In pain, the voice of pain. The shadow of your cry. And never forget: you are magnificent beyond all colors.
More on the opposition of poetry to fascism next week.
Poetry is the lyric flight, in life, of felt human spirit, Trumpism the dead boot-stomp of the angry body to battle.
AJA
Poet. Storyteller. Dramatist. Essayist. Artificer.
Clayton Eshleman can be an obscure Toledoman but in plain, he was for 60 years one of those 14 minor successes poets who could make a living without teaching. Just catching one of his online will sell you on him. Another idea of his relevant to the Rukeyser. Was that Clayton retailed an idea of Robert Duncan's in 1999. What if the 2000 clock rolled back to 1800? Well then, we would stand a chance of writing only in Things, right? Without exposition and worry abt talking over people.
Looked this morning for Clay. Ehlemann saying "O century of clouds!" About the 20th cent'y. Knowing he would have said it to Muriel. Found in poem Reverberations his direct back and forth with her. [From Scratch_the book]
"Muriel R said if a woman were to speak her pain the world would split open, / Rigoberto Menchu, did you lie? [Clouding your witness]
//or dores the world split open and men retie and splice?
[] By which he means nothing positive, but only that we erect hoarding boards around a work of demolition. His lifework, after leaving Indiana to the acid of rains, was to address the tumuli of the torness of our simplifications with words and immediacies like 'tumulous' and pus and boots. Muriel would stay in electric light to see if that market worker's mumbles panned some bad intent. We appreciate it here. M. You located a volcano of our illiteracy! We want to tell her to stay nonplussed! To give us another ....